The Saxon Secret to Avoiding a Bad Ruler
People, WomeninHistory Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, WomeninHistory Rachel Elwiss Joyce

The Saxon Secret to Avoiding a Bad Ruler

What if the worst rulers in English history didn't have to happen?

Bad kings - the weak, the cruel, the catastrophically incompetent - weren't inevitable. They were the consequence of a system that handed the most powerful job in the kingdom to whoever happened to emerge from the right womb in the right order!

Primogeniture, succession by (male) birth order, gave England Edward II, whose personal failings and political incompetence ended in his deposition and probable murder. It gave England Richard II, whose erratic tyranny triggered a constitutional crisis and cost him his throne. It gave England Henry VI, whose mental collapse plunged the country into thirty years of civil war. These weren't accidents of fate. They were what happens when a system prioritises birth order over every other human quality.

But before the Normans locked this system in place, the Anglo-Saxons did something far more interesting.

The Aetheling System: Choose the Best, Not the First

Read More
Medieval Succession: When Henry II’s Empire Imploded
People, HistoricalEvents Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, HistoricalEvents Rachel Elwiss Joyce

Medieval Succession: When Henry II’s Empire Imploded

When Successionfirst aired, audiences were transfixed by its portrait of a modern dynasty at war with itself: scheming heirs, a manipulative patriarch, and a fortune vast enough to make loyalty negotiable. But centuries before Logan Roy was terrifying his children in glass-walled boardrooms, another ruthless family feud was playing out across medieval Europe.

In 1173, the most powerful man in Christendom—King Henry II of England—faced a rebellion led not by rivals or barons, but by his own wife and sons. Chroniclers called it the Great Rebellion; historians often dub it the Revolt of the Eaglets, after the young “eagles” who turned on the parent bird.

And just like inSuccession, the real question was: who inherits the empire?

Read More
How Nicola de la Haye and Gerard de Camville Conquered the Sea, and Made a Deadly Enemy
People, EnglandAndAngevinEmpire Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, EnglandAndAngevinEmpire Rachel Elwiss Joyce

How Nicola de la Haye and Gerard de Camville Conquered the Sea, and Made a Deadly Enemy

Nicola de la Haye is remembered, rightly, as the woman who held Lincoln Castle through a number of sieges. But while researching her life for Lady of the Castle, I became fascinated by another battle being fought on her lands.

It was a battle against the sea.

And, rather unexpectedly, I discovered that Nicola and Gerard’s attempts to win that battle may also have helped create an enemy who would eventually bring an army to the gates of Lincoln Castle—and come close to having Gerard hanged for treason.

A county being built out of water

Much of Nicola’s land lay in southern Lincolnshire, including estates at Sutton and Lutton in what was then a very different landscape from the one we know today.

Large parts of the Lincolnshire fens were still marsh, saltmarsh and seasonally flooded ground. If you wanted more farmland, you could not simply clear a few trees and start ploughing.

First, you had to make the land.

Read More
The Shadow of Becket: How a Murder Shook the Kingdom
People, HistoricalEvents Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, HistoricalEvents Rachel Elwiss Joyce

The Shadow of Becket: How a Murder Shook the Kingdom

For years, the quarrel between Henry II and Thomas Becket raged. Becket fled to France in 1164, finding refuge with King Louis VII—the same Louis who still burned with resentment against Henry II for marrying Eleanor of Aquitaine. The dispute became as much about politics as faith: two monarchs using one archbishop as a pawn.

In 1170, Henry and Becket made a fragile peace. The archbishop returned to England to cheers from the faithful. But within weeks, their conflict flared again when Becket excommunicated bishops loyal to the crown.

It was then, in a moment of fury, that Henry uttered the words chroniclers would never forget—perhaps not verbatim, but in essence:

“Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?”

Four knights took him at his word.

Read More
Princes Without Power: Why Henry the Young King Rebelled
People, HistoricalEvents Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, HistoricalEvents Rachel Elwiss Joyce

Princes Without Power: Why Henry the Young King Rebelled

On 14 June 1170, in Westminster Abbey, England witnessed a rare spectacle: a king crowned in his father’s lifetime. The boy was Henry, eldest surviving son of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine. At just fifteen, he was anointed, crowned, and hailed as rex iuniorthe Young King.

It should have been the beginning of a glittering reign. Instead, it became the seed of betrayal.

Did you know? Henry the Young King’s coronation feast is covered in Lady of Lincoln.

A King Without a Kingdom

Despite the grandeur of his coronation, the Young King had no real authority. His father ruled with a firm hand and was unwilling to share power. Henry II kept hold of the castles, the revenues, and the decision-making. The son was left with ceremony but no substance.

Contemporaries pitied him. William of Newburgh remarked that the lad “was king in name only, while his father held the reins of government.” Others saw a prince who enjoyed the tournaments and glittering life of a knight but lacked the lands and soldiers that made a medieval ruler truly powerful.

Read More
Willikin of the Weald: Was He the Real Inspiration for Robin Hood?
People, EnglandAndAngevinEmpire Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, EnglandAndAngevinEmpire Rachel Elwiss Joyce

Willikin of the Weald: Was He the Real Inspiration for Robin Hood?

In my previous historical post, I looked at William de Wenneval, the Sheriff of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire during the years when Richard the Lionheart was absent on crusade and then held captive in Germany.

Wenneval was one of the men who controlled Nottingham Castle while Prince John was plotting against his brother. That does not make him the Sheriff of Nottingham from the Robin Hood stories, but it places a real royal official in the right position, in the right place and at the right moment to have contributed something to the legend.

But what about Robin Hood himself?

There have been many attempts to identify a historical man behind the famous outlaw. One of the most intriguing candidates lived not in Sherwood Forest, but in the wooded country of Kent and Sussex. His name was William of Cassingham, although he became better known as Willikin of the Weald.

Unlike Robin Hood, Willikin was unquestionably real.

He was an archer and local fighting man who gathered a company in the forests, attacked occupying troops from ambush and became a hero to the communities around him. He fought during the reign of King John and was praised by medieval chroniclers for resisting England’s enemies when much of the south-east had submitted to them.

It sounds remarkably familiar.

So could Willikin of the Weald have helped inspire the legend of Robin Hood?

Read More
The Real Sheriff of Nottingham?
People, EnglandAndAngevinEmpire Rachel Elwiss Joyce People, EnglandAndAngevinEmpire Rachel Elwiss Joyce

The Real Sheriff of Nottingham?

Every Robin Hood story needs its villain, and for centuries that villain has worn one title above all others: the Sheriff of Nottingham. Cruel, greedy, complicit in every injustice done to the poor of Sherwood while good King Richard bled for Christendom on crusade and wicked Prince John schemed at home. It's one of the most durable double acts in English folklore.

But strip away the ballads and pantomime, and the officeholders behind that legendary title were real men, doing a real and often thankless job. One of the strongest candidates for the historical figure behind the "bad" sheriff of the Robin Hood tales is a man called William de Wenneval (his name also appears as Wendenal, Wendeval, or Wendenall, depending on which chronicle or charter you're reading: spelling in the 1190s was a moving target). He is a minor figure in the great chronicles, mentioned only in passing by Roger of Howden.

But the little that survives of his story is enough to suggest he paid an appalling price for his loyalty.

Read More